summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/content
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
authorChristoph Cullmann <cullmann@kde.org>2024-05-11 17:06:42 +0200
committerChristoph Cullmann <cullmann@kde.org>2024-05-11 17:06:42 +0200
commit9be16cd194559072094befe1eafc469b1cfe00ad (patch)
treea84ed53340fdab56d239e3b4a624354e2a17b9d1 /content
parent8b5c1688974c57f7a7b6811af9db2e4733dde8cf (diff)
more drafting
Diffstat (limited to 'content')
-rw-r--r--content/posts/kde-applications-and-icons/index.md43
1 files changed, 5 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/content/posts/kde-applications-and-icons/index.md b/content/posts/kde-applications-and-icons/index.md
index af204fd..9e7a4d2 100644
--- a/content/posts/kde-applications-and-icons/index.md
+++ b/content/posts/kde-applications-and-icons/index.md
@@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ resources:
In this rather lengthy post I talk a bit about the current issues with icons for the KDE applications I work on or use.
-Let's start with looking at what I mean with KDE applications and what the current state is, up to KDE Frameworks 6.2 and current KDE Gear 24.04.
+Let's start with looking at what I mean with KDE applications and what the current state is, up to KDE Frameworks 6.2 and current KDE Gear 24.02.
Then let's see what will be improved in future releases.
## What do I mean with 'KDE Applications'
@@ -42,13 +42,13 @@ If you just aim to run on the KDE Plasma desktop with your Qt and KDE Frameworks
The KDE project did their job, at least for Kate I never did have any issues with icons on Plasma.
-
-## How it shall look...
-
-### Linux & BSDs
+Below a screenshot of Kate 24.02 running on Plasma 6. All icons are there, they are properly re-colored for the dark theme, too, including not just the used Breeze icons but for example the small Git icons in the left sidebar that Kate has bundled.
<center><a href="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-linux-wayland.png" target="_blank"><img width=700 src="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-linux-wayland-small.png"></a></center>
+This is the vanilla state each user will get if Kate is installed on Plasma (and the dark theme is used).
+There are no patches done during building to achieve that nor is there any extra user configuration necessary.
+
### Windows
<center><a href="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-windows.png" target="_blank"><img width=700 src="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-windows-small.png"></a></center>
@@ -57,39 +57,6 @@ The KDE project did their job, at least for Kate I never did have any issues wit
<center><a href="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-macos.png" target="_blank"><img width=700 src="/posts/kate-on-all-platforms-2024/images/2024-kate-macos-small.png"></a></center>
-## State on Fedora 40 Workstation & XFCE Spin...
-
-Screenshots taken from the [GNOME bugtracker](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288), copies to not stall their GitLab instance.
-
-<center><a href="/posts/kate-and-icons/images/fedora-40-workstation.jpg" target="_blank"><img width=700 src="/posts/kate-and-icons/images/fedora-40-workstation.jpg"></a></center>
-
-<center><a href="/posts/kate-and-icons/images/fedora-40-xfce.png" target="_blank"><img width=700 src="/posts/kate-and-icons/images/fedora-40-xfce.png"></a></center>
-
-I think that is rather unpleasant and for e.g. the left icon-only border just an unusable insult.
-
-## Why? The Adwaita Icon Theme no longer follows the FDO icon naming spec
-
-There was no information that they want to break away from the icon naming 'the world' does assume (given there is a [spec](https://specifications.freedesktop.org/icon-naming-spec/latest/ar01s04.html)).
-And now we have that state for our users there, at least on these spins.
-
-That is not that nice, we did spend a lot of work to get our applications working cross-desktop and even cross-platform and now that...
-
-I feel rather infuriated, finding this before going to sleep, even more after reading the feedback in the [GNOME bugtracker](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288) and that this is just closed as 'so be it'.
-
-They added now at least a hint to the README:
-
-[**Private UI icon set for GNOME core apps.**](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/commit/ad605446a829420b659c7f360333e4309a8f4a55)
-
-Ok, I assume that is then all fine.
-
-No, it is not.
-
-Then please don't install it as FDO icon theme and break all FOSS apps that rely on the naming spec...
-
-If you care for non 'GNOME core apps' to work per default properly on distributions like that, please either get them to fix it (hints are given in the [linked issue](https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/adwaita-icon-theme/-/issues/288)) or get the distributions to install a compliant theme.
-
-We can plan to work around this mess in [the future](https://invent.kde.org/frameworks/kiconthemes/-/issues/3) on our side, but that will not un-break the application versions that are now already shipped to our users and non-KDE frameworks based stuff that will just run into the same issues.
-
## Feedback
You can provide feedback on the matching [KDE Social](https://lemmy.kde.social/post/1212069), [reddit](https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1chzmya/kde_kate_editor_icons_or_how_fedora_40_with_the/) or [Hacker News](https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40230558) post.